Subbing

Over the last year I have signed up as a substitute for a few different schools in my area. I have tried really hard to keep myself in the upper level grades such as 5/6 or 9 through 12. Last week, I stepped out of my comfort zone and I substituted for a teacher who teaches first and second grade. That was a very eye-opening experience for me and trying to follow sub notes to help 13 children with sometimes different tasks only makes me appreciate teachers more. I do the best I can with sub plans, but I don't know how these teachers manage to teach their students and do the things that they do in such organized and caring ways. I looked at the work these students are doing and I felt gratitude anew for the teachers in my life that have brought me to this point. I am now a college graduate and I was able to do so because each and every teacher I've ever had has encouraged me to succeed and has worked with me to do better. There are some really amazing teachers out there and I'm grateful for every single one of them. I am sure I will continue to substitute and will continue to get put into classes and age groups that do not feel inherently comfortable to me. I will hopefully grow to not only feel more comfortable with teaching younger children, but to continue to feel thankful for the good teachers out there who care for and work so hard to help those children grow academically. I'm lucky to have these opportunities.

Sexual and Gender Diverse Adolescents and the Failures of Traditional Education in Public Education: Sources

This post is just the full list of sources including some sources that I didn't use. It is not fully comprehensive of all potential sources, but it is mostly complete. So for those readers who want to do some research of their own, here is a good start. Also here is a link to a show that gave me the idea to do the research to begin with: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver- Sexual Education.


Works Cited

1. Blount, J. M. (2016). Controlling Sex: Modern Histories of Sex Education. Reviews in American History, 44(4), 611-62.

2. Denny, G., & Young, M. (2006). An Evaluation of an Abstinence‐Only Sex Education Curriculum: An 18‐Month Follow‐up. Journal of School Health, 76(8), 414-422.

3. Denny, G., Young, M., Rausch, S., & Spear, C. (2002). An Evaluation of an Abstinence Education Curriculum Series: Sex Can Wait. American Journal Of Health Behavior. 26(5), 366-377.

4. Frieden, T., Jaffe, H., Cono, J. et al. (2015) Sexual Identity, Sex of Sexual Contacts, and Health- Related Behaviors Among Students in Grades 9-12- United States and Selected Sites, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ 2016; 65, p.19-22, retrieved https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/ss/pdfs/ss6509.pdf

5. Gates, G. (2017) Vermont Leads States LGBT Identification, Gallop, retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/203513/vermont-leads-states-lgbt-identification.aspx

6. Hess, A. (2010). Hold the Sex, Please: the Discursive Politics between National and Local Abstinence Education Providers. Sex Education, 10(3), 251-266. doi:10.1080/14681811.2010.491632

7. Jackson, J. (2007) Unmasking Identities: An Exploration of the Lives of Gay and Lesbian Teachers. Lanham, Maryland. Lexington Books

8. Jeffries, W. L., Dodge, B., Bandiera, F. C., & Reece, M. (2010). Beyond abstinence-only: relationships between abstinence education and comprehensive topic instruction. Sex Education, 10(2), 171-185. doi:10.1080/14681811003666317

9. Jennings, K. (2005) One Teacher In 10. Los Angeles, California. Alyson Books
10. Kirby, D., Short, L., Collins, J., Rugg, D., Kolbe, L., Howard, M., … Zabin, L. S. (1994). School-based programs to reduce sexual risk behaviors: a review of effectiveness. Public Health Reports, 109(3), 339–360.

11. Kohler, P. K., Manhart, L. E., & Lafferty, W. E. (2008). Abstinence-only and comprehensive sex education and the initiation of sexual activity and teen pregnancy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42(4), 344-351.

12. Luker, K. (2006). When Sex Goes to School: Warring Views on Sex- and Sex Education- Since the Sixties. New York, W.W. Norton and Company.

13. Macapagal, K., Coventry, R., Arbeit, M., Fisher, C., and Mustanski, B. (2017) “I won’t out myself just to do a survey”: Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents’ Perspectives on the Risks and Benefits of Sex Research, Archives of Sexual Behavior, Volume 46, Issue 5, pp 1393–1409.

14. no author. (2017) LGBT Youth. CDC, retrieved https://www.cdc.gov/lgbthealth/youth.htm

15. no author. (2017). Sex and HIV Education. Guttmacher Institute, retrieved https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/sex-and-hiv-education

16. no author. (2013) Statistical Data- Clark County School District, retrieved on http://www.ccsd.net/resources/budget-finance-department/pdf/publications/cabr/2013/statistical-data.pdf

17. no author. (2017). Sexual Behaviors : HIV, STD, & Teen Pregnancy Prevention. CDC : information gleaned from Division of Adolescent and School Health, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention. retrieved https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/sexualbehaviors/

18. no author. (2017). Teen Pregnancy in the United States. CDC : information gleaned from Division of Reproductive Health and National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, retrieved https://www.cdc.gov/teenpregnancy/about/index.htm

19. Rubenstein, R. (2017). Sex Education: Funding Facts, Not Fear. Health Matrix: Journal Of Law-Medicine, 27525-554.

20. Segal, C. (2017). Eight States Censor LGBTQ Topics in School. Now, a Lawsuit is Challenging That. PBS, retrieved http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/lgbtq-issues-class-lawsuit-utah/

21. Silva, M. (2002). The effectiveness of school-based sex education programs in the promotion of abstinent behavior: a meta-analysis. Health Education Research, 17(4), 471-48.

22. Shtarkshall, R., Santilli, J., and Hirsch, J., (2007). Sex Education and Sexual Socialization: Roles for Educators and Parents. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 166-119.

23. Stanger-Hall, K. F., & Hall, D. W. (2011). Abstinence-only education and teen pregnancy rates: why we need comprehensive sex education in the US. PLoS One, 6(10), e24658.

24. Valenti, J. (2009) The Purity Myth: How America’s Obsession with Virginity is Hurting Young Women. Berkeley, California, Seal Press.

25. Weed, S. E., Ericksen, I. H., Lewis, A., Grant, G. E., & Wibberly, K. H. (2008). An abstinence program's impact on cognitive mediators and sexual initiation. American Journal of Health Behavior, 32(1), 60-73.
b
26. Zimmerman, J. (2015). Too Hot to Handle: A Global History of Sex Education. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.

Other Sources not quoted.....


https://mic.com/articles/123634/john-oliver-laverne-cox-and-nick-offerman-just-gave-us-the-sex-ed-psa-america-needs#.llodWwE3h

Guttmacher Institute, Sex and STD/HIV education, State Policies in Brief, October 2011,, accessed Oct. 19, 2011.

https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/facts-american-teens-sources-information-about-sex

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-domitrz/the-conversation-we-need-_b_7968198.html

http://www.thejournal.ie/john-oliver-sex-ed-2263891-Aug2015/

https://www.thecut.com/2015/08/john-oliver-made-a-very-helpful-sex-ed-video.html

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/john-oliver-eviscerates-american-sex-ed-but-the-reality-is-even-worse-20150813

http://www.rollingstone.com/tv/news/watch-john-oliver-blast-subpar-sex-education-in-u-s-schools-20150810

http://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2015/08/sex-education-last-week-tonight-with.html

http://variety.com/2015/tv/news/john-oliver-sex-ed-psa-laverne-cox-jonathan-banks-nick-offerman-1201566669/

https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/facts-american-teens-sources-information-about-sex

https://www.guttmacher.org/news-release/2012/sex-education-linked-delay-first-sex

https://thinkprogress.org/teen-pregnancies-highest-in-states-with-abstinence-only-policies-8aa0deeebb41

http://www.ibtimes.com/states-reconsider-abstinence-only-sex-ed-programs-obama-congress-battle-over-teen-1804460

https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/sex-and-hiv-education

Sexual and Gender Diverse Adolescents and the Failures of Traditional Education in Public Education: Post #3

* Third part of the term paper titled "Sexual and Gender Diverse Adolescents and the Failures of Traditional Education in Public Education." This post covers the Methodological Framework for Research, Preliminary Implications, and the Conclusion portion of the paper.


Methodological Framework for Research

In order to ascertain what information should be used to develop a comprehensive sexual education curricula to be taught in public schools, a firm baseline of knowledge must be developed. It is proposed that a 2 page survey with optional telephone or in-person interviews should be used for data collection. It is vital that a diverse geographic area be chosen which will ensure the number of respondents needed and also gives more legitimacy to the data collected. The area chosen for this study is Clark County, Nevada which has a diverse population in both very large metropolitan and rural areas and has the fifth largest school district in the United States. This county has almost sixty high schools (magnet and charter high schools included) which allows for the response of at least 70,000 students (full high school student population was estimated as 89,438 as of 2012 so student population might be higher or lower based on community growth.) (no author, 2013) This survey should be given to all students who attend any public middle or high school in the selected county. The survey will be multiple choice and should be electronically scored.

It is recommended that the survey be presented to students on a Wednesday during second period (to assure the most attendance by participants) and that students should be given fifteen minutes to fill out the questionnaire. This recommendation means that students will receive the survey during classes that may not be focused on health; however, this will assure that the full student population is covered if all potential participants are given the survey at approximately the same time.

Confidentiality should be stressed to the students and questionnaires should be picked up by the teacher at the end of the period. Survey questions will contain questions on age of sexual initiation, behaviors used, sexual orientation and gender identity, negative consequences of sexual behavior, and related content including racial identity, relationship development and positive life skills. A survey was chosen over interviews as the best form of research as many people feel more comfortable with answering anonymous questions; it is a less expensive method of collecting large forms of data; and helps to eliminate evaluator bias as every participant gets the same questions. By using such a large group of participants, students who claim sexual diversity can have their thoughts heard and research can get a general idea of what percentage of the student population is gender or sexually diverse.

Preliminary Implications

There are a some potential implications for conducting this research and analyzing the results from data collected. As there doesn’t appear to be much research on diverse sexual orientation and gender identity, this study should give researchers a better understanding of what percentage of students who claim sexual or gender diversity other than heterosexuality. Current research tends to remove this data so the estimates of the statistics of sexual diversity are just that: an estimate. Having a better understanding of what the actual numbers are will give both educators and elected officials a real understanding of the human cost of ineffective sexual education for sexual diverse students. It is one thing to understand that sexual diverse students are most likely to have ‘negative consequences’ due to sexual behavior and imagining those consequences to be felt by a few or small group of individuals. It is another to recognize that the number of affected individuals is larger than assumed. If the numbers of sexually diverse adolescents tend towards the estimated population of American adults who claim sexual diversity, then the population would be estimated between 3.1% to 4.9%. (Gates, 2017) That suggests that possible numbers of sexually diverse high school students in Clark County, Nevada could be estimated as between 2,772 to 4,382 students. It must also be acknowledged that these estimates could be low as the negative social and economic costs to ‘outted’ sexually diverse adults can be quite high. This information should extend the research already collected on some forms of adolescent heterosexual behavior to a more complete picture on all forms of adolescent sexual behavior. Information gleaned from respondent data can then be used to develop a thoughtful and comprehensive sexual education curriculum for use in public schools. Having this information available to those who are attempting to create relevant and useful curricula for students is vital to their success. It is vital to recognize that there may be a small minority of students who will still not feel comfortable with the survey and may choose to not complete it or complete it with false information. However, it is hoped that due to the specific way that the survey is presented to students can help minimize this particular limitation in the data collected.

Another implication is that future researchers could feel more comfortable creating proposals that are more inclusive of sexual diversity rather than removing or throwing out the data collected. Sexuality has many forms and behaviors and limiting the majority of research to heterosexual ‘penile to vaginal’ intercourse leaves out a lot of sexual behavior for all sexual claimants. More research that focuses on sexual behavior in general- including sexual behavior that is socially distasteful such as bestiality- will create a solid baseline on human sexuality, theoretically creating new understanding of human relationships and behavior. The implications of a deeper understanding of human sexual diversity and behavior can be huge as sexual desire and behavior affects so much of ‘the human condition’ and can affect the research of many scientific subjects including biology, psychology, sociology, etc.

Other implications of this research are the ways that the aggregated data could be used to not only shape public school curricula, but also public policy towards education and sexual diversity in our society. In our current political climate and in many communities both in America and around the world, living openly as a sexually diverse individual can come with significant negative consequences from families, communities, and society at large. Using solid research to work towards greater understanding and tolerance of sexual diversity in our society can bring about higher levels of personal and economic success and reduce the negative consequences of sexual diversity that not only harm individuals, but our society as a whole. Civil protections for sexually diverse individuals in housing, the workplace, medical care, family and relationship development, personal safety, and social safety nets could have immense consequences for our society as a whole. Whether these consequences are positive or negative will be determined by the civil protections developed, implemented and disseminated to our society as a whole.

Conclusion

There are many assumptions made about the sexualities and sexual behavior of American adolescents. While there have been numerous studies of some forms of adolescent sexual behavior, there has been very little research on sexual diversity and behavior. I argue that the previous research performed and used to determine the curricula disseminated to public school adolescents is too limited and too politicized to create effective, comprehensive programs. Assumptions about the sexualities of teachers, religious preferences in teaching, how curricula is taught to students, the sexualities of students themselves, political viewpoints, and the needs for a stable society create hurdles for effective and positive sexual education. Assumptions are not always correct and can leave the majority of adolescents without any real information on how to make positive choices with their sexuality and behavior. These negative consequences- including disease and pregnancy-come at both an individual and societal cost. This research will be instrumental in changing the focus of sexual education curricula towards an effective comprehensive program for all students which can truly be used to minimize the negative consequences currently faced by American youth and bring the statistics of these consequences closer to the lower numbers found in other first world nations. As a foundation for further study, this research can be used to more fully understand the true spectrum of sexual diversity and behavior in our society and lead towards more tolerance and understanding throughout society as a whole.

Sexual and Gender Diverse Adolescents and the Failures of Traditional Education in Public Education: Post #2

* Second part of the term paper titled "Sexual and Gender Diverse Adolescents and the Failures of Traditional Education in Public Education." This post covers the Literature Review portion of the paper.

Literature Review

There has been much discussion and disagreement about how the subject of sexual education should be taught in schools and what information should be provided in those classes. This discussion has included parents and schools as well as local, state, and federal governments and influence has flowed both ways. These conversations tend to revolve around concerns about government involvement in family life and sexual education, parental control of the information taught, moral values that might be included in sexual education, and what constitutes age appropriate sexual behavior. (Shtarkshall et al., 2007) The history of sexual education, which recently has enjoyed a increase in research and publications, illuminates a wide variety of curricula and the ways and means of teaching them. (Blout, 2016) It appears that the only consistency in the teaching of sexual education is the controversy and the zeal of the advocates and reformers that are drawn to it.

Over the last few decades, there has been much research has focused on whether different methods of sexual education have been ‘successful’ in terms of stated goals and the desires of the community. However, even here there is disagreement as to what the goals of sexual education programs are: whether to promote safe sexual behaviors in the events of the initiation of sexual experience, prevent negative consequences of sexual behavior such as sexually transmitted disease and pregnancy, or to restrict any sexual behaviors by individuals before marriage for moral or social reasons. It is also difficult to determine whether curricula or outcomes of sexual education are successful because its difficult to collate data across diverse studies. New research provides data that can be used for changing current programs and making them more efficient and successful for students. As it is generally accepted that public schools are the one institution in our society that is regularly attended by most young people, it is schools that have the widest opportunity and responsibility for teaching and addressing sexual risk taking behaviors. (Kirby et al., 1994; Silva, 2002) While limited sexual education has been available to young people for decades, “the AIDS epidemic would change the way many people viewed sexual education; the question was no longer whether schools would teach sexual education; it was what they would teach, and how, and to what end.” (Zimmerman, 2015)

For the purposes of clarity throughout this review, I would like to clearly define a few terms that will be used going forward:

Abstinence-only sexual education is typically defined as curricula that tell learners that they should wait to participate in sexual intimacy until they are married. (Kirby et al., 1994) These programs may also contain extra lessons on self esteem, communication, decision making, life planning, and cooperative learning. (Denny et al., 2002) To receive federal funding, these programs must also comply with Section 510 A-H of Title V which includes: an exclusive purpose to teach the social, psychological and health gains that are achieved through sexual abstinence, that abstinence is the expected standards for all students and the only certain way to avoid STD’s and pregnancy (Kohler et al., 2008), that a mutually faithful monogamous relationship in the context of marriage is the expected social standard and that sexual activity outside of marriage is likely to have harmful consequences for the student, potential children, and society. It must teach students how to reject sexual advances, how alcohol and drug use increase vulnerability to sexual advances, and the importance of attaining self sufficiency before engaging in sexual activity. (Rubenstein, 2017) Federal law also states that programs that use federal funds can not teach about contraceptives except to emphasis failure rates. (Jeffries et al., 2010)

Comprehensive sexual education (CSE) is defined as programming that seeks to postpone early sexual involvement, but also discusses both abstinence and contraception (the different methods available, instructions for use, etc.) as well as HIV/AIDS prevention. Some comprehensive programming also teaches other pertinent topics: human development and puberty, reproductive anatomy and health, pregnancy and prenatal care, consent, development of positive relationships, decision making, communication and interpersonal skills, and intimacy. (Kirby et al., 1994) Also, this type of sexual education may, if allowed by law, discuss sexual assault, sexual orientation, other sexual behaviors, and gender identity. (Jeffries et al., 2010)

One of the most important and easily quantifiable reasons that successful sexual education is needed can be seen in the recent statistics released for 2015 from the Centers of Disease Control. In that year, a total of 229,715 babies were born to women between the ages 15–19 years, for a birth rate of 22.3 per 1,000 women in this age group. In the same year, young adults (aged 13-24) accounted for an estimated 22% of all new HIV diagnoses in the United States. Half of the nearly 20 million new STDs reported each year were diagnosed in individuals between 15 to 24 years of age. (CDC, Sexual 2017) While 2015 shows birth rates for American teenagers at a record low with evidence suggesting the declines are due to abstinence and consistent contraception use, the teen pregnancy rate in the United States is still substantially higher than in other western industrialized nations, and racial/ethnic and geographic disparities in teen birth rates persist. (CDC, Teen 2017; Stanger-Hall and Hall, 2011)

Because we as a society have determined that pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases are unfavorable outcomes for adolescents, research identifying distinguishing characteristics in effective sexual education programs- whether comprehensive or abstinence-only- is key. According to Kirby et al., effective programs used social learning theories such as social cognitive theory, social inoculation theory, and cognitive behavioral theory, etc. as a foundation for program development and included a narrow focus on reducing sexual risk-taking behaviors that may lead to STD’s or unintended pregnancy. (1994) According to Jeffries et al., more than 140 national scientific organizations acknowledge that CSE can effectively meet adolescents’ sexual needs. Their conclusions are based upon numerous findings that CSE effectively promotes abstinence and may delay sexual debut, reduce sexual frequency, reduce the number of lifetime sexual partners, reduce the risk of STD transmission, and increase the likelihood of consistent contraceptive use. (2010) Silva, who analyzed the success rates of several studies, found that some studies believe that more parental involvement in teaching sexual behavior may have contributed to higher abstinence rates; however, she acknowledges that parents who were willing and able to participate in these programs may differ in important demographic or lifestyle characteristics from those who did not participate, possibly skewing the data collected. (2002) Through research based on a national analysis of all state data available, Stanger-Hall and Hall show that abstinence-only education doesn't reduce, and likely increases teen pregnancy rates, while comprehensive sexual education that included abstinence as a desired behavior was correlated with the lowest teen pregnancy rates across states. (2011) However, all of these studies have some limitations which make for a shaky foundation when creating new programs and protocols for more effective sexual education. As suggested by Silva, research in sex education could be greatly improved if more efforts were directed to test interventions utilizing random controlled trials, measuring intervening variables variables and a more careful and detailed reporting of the results. (2002)

One clear oversight in both abstinence-only and many comprehensive sexual education programs is the recognition and teaching of sexual diversity. Very little research has been completed with a view to understanding how to recognize and teach individuals who claim a sexuality other than heterosexuality and students who report any form of sexuality other than heterosexuality are removed from studies to keep the results consistent for the majority population studied. For example, Kohler et al. specify in their research that “Individuals reporting sexual orientation other than heterosexual were also excluded as programs do not address same-sex behaviors.” (2008) Denny and Young state that in their questionnaires that sexual intercourse is defined as “ the male’s penis is in the female’s vagina” while Weed and his group of researchers measured data based on “virgin students who went on to have vaginal sexual intercourse.” (2006; 2008) Valenti writes that educators in abstinence-only sexual education are mandated to define the term ‘marriage’ as only “a legal union between one man and one women as a husband and wife” and the word ‘spouse’ as only “a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or wife” (Valenti, 2009) Luker notes in her book that she restricted herself to heterosexuality discussions “as the public discussion itself did.” (2006) Blount states that same sex desire and gender nonconformity have been so strenuously and consistently rooted out of sexual education curricula that the need for rigorous scholarship and additions to sex education protocols is significant. (2016)

This oversight in the acknowledgment and instruction of sexual diversity has come at a high cost to LGBTQI students and young adults. Among young people (aged 13-24) diagnosed with HIV in 2015, 81% were gay and bisexual males. (CDC, Sexual 2017) Data provided from the 2015 National Youth Risk Behavior Survey of surveyed LGBT students states that these students are at an increased risk of being threatened, bullied, or injured on school property or online. LGBT students are also at an increased risk of sexual and physical dating violence, and rape. (no author, LGBT…2017) These students are more likely to have problems with depression and are four times more likely to commit suicide than heterosexual youth. (Frieden et al., 2015) Eight states- Alabama, Arizona, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, and Utah- limit what teachers can say about homosexuality and some of these states require inaccurate information to be shared with students. (Segal, 2017) For instance, Alabama education law requires that sex education programs emphasize that homosexuality is not a lifestyle acceptable to the general public, that homosexual conduct is a criminal offense under the laws of the state, and prevents educators from mentioning “that some methods of sex are safe methods for homosexual sex.” (Rubenstein, 2017) Hess notes that if some abstinence-only providers mention homosexuality, it is mentioned as a lifestyle with shocking negative consequences that can only be solved by marrying someone of the opposite gender. (2010) Therefore, students who do not identify as heterosexual may not find any mention of sexual diversity in their taught curriculum and, if it is mentioned, only negative or possibly inaccurate information is provided. It is important to note that until recently, same sex marriage was not an available option for homosexual individuals, effectively telling these students that they must remain celibate throughout their life span. While the legal union of marriage is now open to either heterosexual or homosexual relationships, many sexual education programs still teach that if you are homosexual, you must remain abstinent unless you marry a partner of the opposite sex. (Hess, 2010) Lastly, teachers who identify as LGBTQI fall in the minority and it can still be a challenge for a teacher that is known to identify as other than heterosexual to keep a teaching job. This discrimination suggests to students that their sexuality can affect future employment unless closeted. (Jennings, 2005; Jackson, 2007)

Another significant problem with specific abstinence-only curricula is how these lessons are taught: metaphors used, abstinence decisions as absolutes, etc. Most abstinence-only curricula do not discuss consent or sexual assault, but do use metaphors that imply that sexual activity degrades the female body. (Valenti, 2009) These metaphors include licked cupcakes or chocolate, sharing cups of spit, chewed up gum, old and worn out shoes, a piece of tape, a rose with no petals, etc. (Rubenstein, 2017) When these metaphors are used or demonstrated to students, many students who have been victims of sexual assault see themselves as broken, dirty, or worthless. These metaphors increase feelings of shame, anger, and embarrassment in victims-- most of whom are women. (Valenti, 2009) Another drawback to using these metaphors is that the use of them can diminish the self worth of individuals who choose to have sex and make them more vulnerable to other health conditions such as depression, eating disorders, etc.

Therefore, it is vitally important that research is conducted and programs tailored to use successful strategies for teaching sexual education to students. An abbreviated listing of sexual education laws per state was compiled by the Guttmacher Foundation in early 2017 which found only 13 states require that the information taught in sexual education protocols must be medically accurate, only eight states require the teaching should be ‘culturally appropriate and unbiased’, and only two states require that sexual education teachings cannot promote religion. (no author, Sex 2017) According to Blount, no program will be successful until the curricula recognize young people as sexual beings, a viewpoint that defies many community assumptions about the sexual innocence of youth. He also states that researchers need to recognize or acknowledge the sexuality of adults who work with adolescents instead of the current standard of assumed asexuality or sexual purity of school workers as a class. (2016) It should also be a given that teachers’ beliefs about the content of sexual education curricula may influence what they teach their students despite what is specifically in the curriculum itself. (Jeffries et al., 2010) Zimmerman suggests that no program will be successful if, at its core, the goals are to control sexuality by fear. (2015) As there is so little consensus on what to teach, how to teach it, when to teach it and what aspects of programs are the most successful, it is vital to encourage further research and scholarship into the matter.

Sexual and Gender Diverse Adolescents and the Failures of Traditional Education in Public Education: Post #1

* First part of the term paper titled "Sexual and Gender Diverse Adolescents and the Failures of Traditional Education in Public Education." This post covers the Abstract and the Background portion of the paper.

Abstract

Sexual Education in the United States has a long and controversial history. Discussions of whether the education is needed, who should distribute the information, where the education should occur, and what information should be included into curricula are all up for debate and disagreement. However, the majority of these discussions, legally mandated public school curricula, and for-profit sexual education speakers all focus on one particular subject: heterosexual sexual desire and behavior. As definitions of sexual behavior tend to normalize heterosexual behavior while ignoring sexually diverse behavior, the majority of studies performed are used to justify or develop public education lesson curricula that are focused on these particular aspects of sexuality. This leaves students who are gender or sexually diverse without any solid education with which to make healthy, informed decisions about their sexuality and behavior, leaving these individuals at high risk for negative consequences of sexual behavior. Therefore, it is vital that studies determine how educational curricula can be used to appropriately educate this minority segment of the population and how best to integrate the needed curricula into public education classrooms, as this is the most common place where sexual education takes place. Researchers and public health officials must also be aware of the risks specific to sexual diverse students that make these individuals less likely to participate fully and honestly in research where there is a perceived risk of confidentiality or privacy failures, allowing their personal information to be released to family, friends, or community members. Recognizing the perceived risks and determining research methods that can minimize these risks can create an environment for safe and complete participation by sexually diverse students which is vital for a full understanding of adolescent student needs.

For the purposes of this paper, individuals and populations that identify as sexually diverse include: gay, lesbian, queer, bisexual, questioning, as well as those who identify as gender non-conforming (transgender and intersex.)

Background

Very little research has been conducted with a view to understanding how to recognize and teach individuals who claim a sexuality other than heterosexuality. On the contrary, many researchers admit that students who report any form of sexuality other than heterosexuality are removed from their studies to keep the results consistent for the majority population studied. As such, the need for valid research that recognizes sexual diversity and works to understand the unique needs of these individuals is evident. Equally obvious are the challenges that an accurate study will have to overcome. As individuals who have sexual diversity in this country are in the minority and are also seen by many majority groups as being deviant (and a host of other negative labels), it will be challenging to create a research project that creates enough confidence in vulnerable individuals to take part while keeping their participation and divulged information confidential.

There is no shortage of data available on heterosexual behavior in adolescents. One question is whether researchers should attempt to separate heterosexual and sexually diverse subjects into separate research projects at all. It should be easier to get accurate information from these adolescents if they are participating in research that includes large quantities of participants so that their personal responses are blended into a larger group of participants and data collection. The majority of studies remove information from participants that admit to any sexuality other than heterosexuality, leaving not only a lack of studies on sexual diversity, but also only a narrow focus on specific forms of heterosexuality. Due to the limitations of the majority of studies performed, this author recommends that research should study the prevalence of sexual and gender diversity in adolescent populations as well as what information should be included in sexual education curricula in public education. This research should also collect statistics on age of sexual initiation, behaviors used, and self-reported negative consequences.

Sexual and Gender Diverse Adolescents and the Failures of Traditional Education in Public Education: An Introduction

This post is an introduction to the next few post sharing a term paper that I completed for a class that I took that focused on sociology and education. The paper is long so I intend to break it into a few posts and I will have a post listing all sources for those who are interested. This topic is near and dear to my heart as I didn't feel like I got a very healthy view of sexuality from my public and religious education and I wondered how widespread disinformation or a lack of information was being taught. Turns out, its really more common than I expected. If fact, it appears that a lack of comprehensive sexual education is the norm and not an outlier at all.

I hope my readers enjoy the paper and, per usual, I am interested in your critique and comments. Enjoy.

Busy Time

The last month or so has been very busy for me. On top of my usual responsibilities and life changes, one of my co-workers has been out with surgery and recovery time and I have been trying to take her place. I have known for a while that working full-time for me- at least in the jobs that I've had over the last few years - is no longer physically possible for me for long periods of time. This was a great experiment as I was able to sort of see how long I could work full time before my body complains too loudly. I discovered that I can't work too much without having significant health issues. I am very grateful that my coworker is back and my hours have been cut back down. As much as I need the money... I definitely don't need the physical pain that I was getting.

Since I've been so busy with work I really haven't accomplished very much else. I have some genealogy that I've been trying to work on and I have been very slow at accomplishing it. I've looked at a few online sources for doing college classes that I can get for free- I would like to take more classes but I'm not sure I want to go on to a graduate degree- and I haven't spent any time following up on those either. I've done the bare minimum on my housework and I'm grateful to have some time off to try to make my house cleaned up and enjoyable again.

I have quite a lot to be grateful for. I'm so thankful and thrilled to be able to spend some time with Katey this weekend. I'm grateful for the time to work on getting my body back to a more stable condition. I've had some time to catch up on housework and I have a fridge full of fresh food. I recently had some flooding in my house and I am fully caught up in getting that picked up, cleaned up, and getting everything back to normal. I have most of my garden pots and beds set up for the season and filled with dirt and compost... I'm almost ready to add seedlings. I have happy feline companions and the mice are hanging in there as well. I've had time to read some books and catch up on paperwork. I'm able to end this day resting on my couch enjoying a few episodes of "Red Dwarf." I have a cup of cinnamon tea and dried bananas to snack on. In essence, I have been better, but I'm doing well. I have a few BLS classes over the next few days, a day at the pharmacy, and family time this week. This is a week to rest in spare moments and get ready to get back to my normal priorities and work load next week. So I'll rest up and get ready for what the future holds. Let's see what happens next.

Professional Participation Activity at the Birchwood Living Center

This is a paper I wrote on my experience last April of spending eight hours interviewing and learning about different ways of working to educate adult students with disabilities. It has been heavily edited for privacy concerns. I absolutely fell in love with this facility and I am grateful for the time I spent there. Without further ado, here it is. :)


Throughout this class we have discussed the many ways that education happens and how diverse challenges can be addressed to promote social parity and learning advancement in students. Our classwork has focused on school age individuals, public education, and uses and access to literature as many of us hope to work in the public education system. I was interested in how nursing or primarily medical facilities dealt with trying to stimulate and educate older individuals. After some research and discussion, I chose to observe and participate with teaching at the Birchwood Living Center located in Ellsworth, Maine. It is a program under the management of Yesterday’s Children, Inc. and is an inpatient nursing facility for individuals with intellectual disabilities and unique medical needs. The residential program can accept up to 15 clients at a time and the facility caters to all their medical, dietary, and educational needs. The clients that I observed in this facility were varied in diagnoses and medical needs, however, many were non-verbal and limited in many aspects of physical expression/ movement due to their specific disabilities.

I visited this facility on two separate occasions and participated in a few different activities- I will focus on day treatment and on understanding how this facility addressed the educational needs of its clients as well as the individuals specific medical needs that impact educational success (occupational therapy, sensory integration), as well as physical health.
All inpatients attend the Day Treatment program in a nearby building and this is where most of the group activities happen. A ratio of four staff members to eleven clients is maintained and it is this that makes this particular facility very different from other facilities who might care only for immediate medical needs. Clients are removed at different times from the group to complete some forms of therapy. I watched as a large group of clients was seated around a table making some get well cards for missing staff members. Some members were in regular chairs and some in specialized chairs while one slouched forward nearby wearing a helmet for their protection from potential falls. The majority of the physical work- picking up stickers and sticking onto card paper, bending, folding etc.- was completed by support staff. I observed questions and choices of stickers and designs asked by staff to different members of the group and eventual choices were made based on feedback received from group members. I am not knowledgeable enough to recognize how each member’s level of attention was focused. What I did observe was that I could start a conversation with someone, give them a marker or a pen, and suggest drawing, and I would get appropriate physical responses to my requests- a name written, a picture scribbled together. I rarely got verbal responses; if I did they were not usually words, but laughs, shrieks, and other noises. It was very apparent that the staff members could interpret correctly what was being said even if it was not clear to me; I still feel a bit of awe and wonder from watching that. I saw no behavioral difficulties that were out of the norm for each person- for some clients, aggression or self-abuse are common to their diagnoses and it is watched and redirected when appropriate.

Each individual who was removed from the group for therapy was removed for only a short time to a side room with a worker. Therapy available includes occupational and physical therapy to help promote functionality, mobility, and fitness for these individuals- many of whom are confined to specialized chairs due to poor physical independence. I watched therapy given to promote relaxation and encourage muscle use and development as well as sensory processing. Sometimes it was obvious that the person didn’t have any interest in participating in their therapy that day and they would make that abundantly clear in both physical and verbal ways. Redirection was kind and thoughtful and modifications in materials were sometimes made to achieve compliance without complaint. It is not required that all individuals must be in the group the whole time and I observed some patients removing themselves from the group for periods of time for their own comfort or privacy. Even with these wanderings (which were quietly supervised), it seemed that full inclusion was achieved to the best of each individual’s ability to participate.

As a potential future educator, I found this facility to be well- organized and primed to do the very best they can to help their clients progress in all aspects of their lives. Aspects of successful classroom activities were easily discernible in most parts of the facility: student pictures, artwork, and statements of patient rights were hanging on all public walls; teaching and therapy aids were easily seen and accessed; the day treatment facility has lots of natural light and appropriate ambient temperatures. There are areas for individual and group meetings, instruction, or medical or physical needs that are easily accessible. I also appreciated the other modifications that I saw all over the facility – such as color and areas for personal belongings- to attempt to soften the harshness and institutional flavor of what is an inpatient, residential facility- a difficult feat to achieve and not one that the center fully accomplished as evidenced by the obvious signs of institutional care and not home living. I look forward to learning more about this facility and its role in my community through future interactions.

Thoughts on Globalization, Education, and Interdisciplinarity

I think that globalization is affecting not only my education, but almost all aspects of the world that I live in. My grandparents spoke of a time where the world was ‘small’- people didn’t move very far away, family was close by, and most everyone works jobs that were common to the area or available where they were living in. They spoke of people moving around and the exodus of the nuclear family in regards to several generations living close by. The world described by them seemed quite compact and finite. I look at the world as I live in it and also see it as ‘small’, but not for the same aspects. A person can live in Salt Lake City and telecommute to complete their work in Tokyo, or can work at home with an internet connection that brings business and money directly to them in their home. In that perspective, I see the world as potentially small because communities and border no longer hold people into a few options for financial success. That said, I see the world as a vast global community with only a small percentage of people having the opportunities I mentioned above and for the majority the opportunities of financial success are stagnant no matter where they live. Globalization has affected my college as the faculty look to provide educations that will give their graduates an advantage in global market places- the positive effects of their efforts provide more options to students for future career paths… the negative is that higher education is still only truly available to a small percentage of the people in my communities (as well as the global population as a whole.) Globalization has created more options; different degrees, different career paths, pathways to success, etc… However, globalization both in education and life come with costs. The larger the picture, the easier it is to lose the value that is found in diversity, the desire to understand global problems, and the apathy to ignore the social justice and consequences inherent in globalization.

“...one aspect of my complex identity”

I liked this quote because it reminds me of how each of us prepares for our lives and actions every day. I am white and female… but I am also a mother, a student, an ex-wife, a Mormon, a lover, a friend, a mentor, a political activist, an animal welfare provider, a pharmacy technician, a BLS educator, and I could go on as I think most of us could. We all live within the labels that we create for ourselves or are thrust upon us. In some ways, life after university doesn’t feel that different to me than my current daily life. Only one of those labels will change- from student to graduate- and while I can obtain a different job and change or modify another label or two- everything else will stay the same. What I feel like my education has provided me that will continue to make a difference in my future after schooling is how I think and respond to information and behavior both around me and concerning me. I no longer take all information at face value and tend to analyze more. I think I recognize more often when engagement isn’t a great idea, how to respond to negative people and situations, and what to reasonably expect when I advocate for positions that are unpopular both in my community and culture. The ability to analyze, question, and look for better ways of understanding and empathy will serve me well in whatever economic or personal job choices I make.

The ability to understand the needs of interdisciplinary connections and underpinnings in discovering and understanding new forms of knowledge is pretty crucial. A fact held alone by itself is a bit like a toothpick- almost any other fact can make the first look suspect and sometimes can be used to disabuse it of its ‘fact’ status. Making decisions on the basis on one fact tends to cause significant problems in explanation and implementation creating outcomes that are rarely the ones anticipated. I would also argue that can a fact be a ‘fact’ if it cannot be proven on its own merits? Can it only be considered a fact if other knowledge helps sustain its truthful countenance? I would be interested in other’s ideas on that concept. True knowledge can be supported by facts surrounding it and about it- I tend to think of knowledge as the nucleus of the cell which can not live on its own, but needs the support of its ‘interdisciplinary team’ to survive and express itself as needed in its environment. Or put another way; we know what a nucleus does because of how it interacts with the other parts of the cell… and we know how the other parts of the cell work and express themselves due to their responses to the nucleus. A study of one must necessitate a study and recognition of all parts for a true, deep understanding.

What are your thoughts? How do you use interdisciplinary thinking in your life?

Today

I have a lot on my mind today. I had a wonderful day with Brock and some great food. I'm so grateful for the time that I have to spend with family and I loved listening to Brock tell me about the things that interest him. My heart is full of so many things and I don't know how to articulate very many of them nor should I share all of them. What I wouldn't give for a pensieve some days... to just siphon off the extra thoughts and emotions and to be able to look for the patterns and the understanding in them and I'm more detached and unbiased manner. I bet all of us could use that every once in awhile.

I had got to spend a little bit of time today going through paperwork and old school assignments and over the next few months I'm going to post a lot of that stuff here. Some of it is very scholarly stuff such as history essays, lesson plans, etc... some of it is thoughts on assignments and things that I read for classes... and some of it is just research and other information that I think I'd like to keep for future use and perusal. So this is your warning that I'm going to start posting a bunch of mismatched sort of stuff in the next few weeks. I really have taken so many varied classes over the years....

I got as much rest as I could today and I'm looking forward to work tomorrow. Here's to a peaceful evening with a few episodes of Mrs Brown's Boys.

Gratitude - 12/11/2017

1. I am so grateful for a working car. It may not look like much, but it gets me to where I need to go and that is a blessing.

2. I am grateful for the discovery of cooked turkey for cat food. Melrose is never full and the quantity of food that skinny cat can eat is phenomenal. Being able to fill a bowl with shreds of roast turkey has been a godsend the last week or so. I'm going to cook another one this weekend.

3. I am grateful for my toes. Lately, they have started to pull apart and pop right out of their sockets which has been very uncomfortable, but I can easily move them back into place each and every time. I don't have to see doctors or deal with much more than the discomfort of their movement and I can still stand and walk well. Toes are amazing little critters and I can't imagine how well I would stand without them no matter how hypermobile they are..

4. Somewhere in this world, someone is probably being chased by a lion or another animal that doesn't have benign intentions towards them. I am grateful that I am safe and warm at home and do not have to worry about my safety.

5. I am grateful for hugs.

6. I love my feline companions and cannot imagine a world without them. They truly enrich my life so many times a day that I could never keep count.

7. I am thankful for an amazing ex who made me leftovers for the beginning of this week so that i could focus on other things.

8. I feel a bit sad that Cuddles needed to be put to sleep this week, but I am so grateful for the time and love she gave me. An unexpected blessing when she cam into my life, but he is already missed. Bug is already trying to con me into getting another one to hug. Bug really loves hugs and so do I :)

9. I love CPR students who really want to learn and take joy in the learning. It make teaching a joyful and fulfilling process.

10. I am so happy that Remus is doing so, so well. He seems happy and doesn't seem to miss his tail at all. He is just settling in to feeling happy and healthy. That is a relief and joy to write. So...

11. I am grateful to amazing veterinarians so help try and make pets and furry companions live healthy, happy lives. I don't know what I would do without them in the background ready when I need them. Having a good relationship with a veterinarian is just as important to me as the relationship that I have with my own doctor so I am thankful that I have that... even if I use him way too much sometimes.

What are you thankful for today?

Gratitude- 12/4/2017

1. I love having the opportunity to volunteer in my community. I work alongside so many nice women with a multitude of life experiences and I love hearing about their lives and family.

2. I love my Bug. He is a mixture of wonderful and frustrating in a gorgeous teenage package. Watching him eat (and the quantity of it) reminds me of myself decades ago. It makes me smile.

3. I love my Nook. I got it for wicked cheap when I was in Utah visiting my grandfather for the last time and I love haven't a book to read anywhere that I go. It's so convenient to curl up with and gives me more options for reading.... with four huge bookshelves in my house I could use some more 'compact' storage. :)

4. I love having the opportunity to draw and goof off with pastels, pencils and trying to re-create the images that are the brainchild of other artists... so I can read about their motivations and try to learn to recreate their images. A challenging but fun process.

5. I love having my own Minion. His purr and weight are extremely comforting and he is simply a mellow soul and quite gorgeous.

6. I am grateful for my pile of blankets. It is a joy to be able to have enough blankets that if one gets dirty I can change it without having to plan a quick trip to the laundromat.

7. I am grateful for sister-in-laws. Some of the most powerful blessings and relationships in my life have come from these two women. I am more grateful to them for their care and friendship that I can express.

8. I am grateful for post it notes. They are extremely convenient as I wade through piles of paperwork and prepare different tasks simultaneously. They are a bit silly, but make planning ahead easier.

9. I am grateful for canned pears- they are so good and I can eat them all year including December in Maine. Enough said.

10. I am so thankful that Remus got his surgery today. That takes a load off of my mind and will make his life so much easier and pain free. Tail today... gone tomorrow.

What are you grateful for today?

Analysis of the Article : “Neurodiversity: The Future of Special Education”

This post is an analysis of an education article titled “Neurodiversity: The Future of Special Education”. You can find a link to the original article here. The following is a thoughtful response that I wrote for a small audience and I thought I would share it here.

Special Education is a topic that is near and dear to my heart as I know several individuals and families that depend on its services to educate their children. While laws require that schools offer and fund these services to students, how they are offered and performed can vary greatly in schools; even schools in the same district can have widely varied programs available. Some schools may even choose to flout the laws requiring special education and parents are forced to start lawsuits to achieve any services as all. One thing that seems consistent in schools over the country is how special education and those students who need it are viewed: students with disabilities are seen as having problems and weaknesses and those who need special education are not as intelligent or as able as ‘normal’ students. These viewpoints with their emphasis on disability, dysfunction, and other negative connotations that go hand in hand with them can cause resignation and a negative outlook in students and families for their future prospects. Thomas Armstrong brings a fresh perspective on special education and how the perspectives and viewpoints of teachers and schools can and should change to facilitate better learning, the development of programs that support a ‘whole person’ growth, and to develop positive perspectives and momentum both in scholarship and individual growth.

In his article titled “Neurodiversity: The Future of Special Education”, Armstrong states that the ways special education programs are currently developed and understood by its practitioners needs to change in several key ways. He suggests that schools and educators recognize the neurodiversity of students as a positive trait to be honored and respected just as with other human diversity traits such as race, gender identity, religion, etc. While current programs for exceptional education tends to emphasize a student’s deficits and strengths, he believes that a new approach should be developed that emphasizes the students’ strengths (such as what currently happens for gifted or talented students.) Some formal assessments to help determine a students’ strengths are the VIA Character Strengths, Virtues, Dunn and Dunn Learning Style Assessments, and the Baron-Welsh Art Scale. Informal assessments that are currently available for educators to utilize for additional information on learning strengths is the Neurodiversity Strengths Checklist, “strength chats” as devised by Epstein (2008), and motivational interviewing. This emphasis on positive talents should then be used to build on the students’ strengths and minimize their weakest areas by utilizing workarounds to help students manage both academic and nonacademic challenges without allowing their disability to hinder them. According to Armstrong, this approach is very different than current special education services where students are taught how to live with their disability instead of working to overcome it.

Another key component of Armstrong’s suggested neurodiversity acceptance is that all students in classrooms need to be taught about the intrinsic worth of human variation and neurological diversity. By educating all students on how the human brain works, how environment shapes brain structure and function, and that all students have a capacity for learning, the expectations of everyone involved in the special education system would change. Some research studies suggest that when teachers expect positive outcomes from their students, academic results usually improve. Also, inclusion would be more effective as learning diversified students would be viewed more as assets in the classroom rather than a difficulty or burden. As a side benefit, if students are taught to respect and embrace neurodiversity, students who learn or act differently are more likely be accepted by their peer groups and less likely to be marginalized or bullied. If implemented, the author’s recommendations have a significant potential to change the way special education is understood and provided to students as well as positive implications for both individual and community development.

This article has several strengths. The author discussed traditional methods of special education and compares and contrasts these methods with his recommendations. He includes research that supports his conclusions and also addresses some of the challenges that would need to be overcome to implement them. He suggests assessments that are currently available to educators to help determine student strengths so that they can be used to facilitate a learner in knowledge attainment. He states that educators who start to utilize these methods will have positive feelings for the children they teach who have learning weaknesses and that these positive feelings will translate into strength manipulation to help students recognize and work to overcome the learning areas in which they are weak. Armstrong’s work can be used for students that have been shunted into special education to help create IEPs that truly look at the student as a whole person and not just a list of ‘things to check off.’

One weakness that the article has is the author’s use of polarity language. He uses language to discuss his thesis and special education in ways that is inherently divisive. His recommendations are littered with language that radiates positivity: growth mindset, nuance, creating, thrive, transformation, assets, etc. However, the language used to describe the current system is very different: deficit, disorder, dysfunction, negative connotations, insular, remediation, burdens, etc. I do not disagree necessarily with his word choices as they do allow him to discuss his research with readers and work to motivate educators into implementing his stated program. However, I worry that the language used may turn off some of the very people that are needed to implement the changes suggested. Another weakness is that the author doesn’t address funding needs to implement his changes. Armstrong acknowledges that both educators and parents may fear the process of funding special education for children if disabilities are viewed more positively- it is the use of terms such as disability and dysfunction that make that funding currently available. If his recommendations are put into normal usage, would the funding dry up? I think that it is quite understandable to worry about this aspect as, even with protections for funding that are required by law, these regulations are still held in contempt by some schools and school districts. Armstrong suggests a way to protect current funding under the system by continuing to use the traditional methods of determining disability and dysfunction that will open the door to special education services. Educators would then try to discard the ‘disability mindset’ after initial diagnosis and use the recommendations stated above to motivate and teach their students. However, Armstrong does not suggest how to get the funding to utilize his recommendations in the classroom. He recognizes the financial problems that are conceivable if special education funding becomes restricted, but he doesn’t offer any ideas as to how to use that funding for development of similar programing in schools. At one point in the article, Armstrong gives suggestions for educators to utilize his research; schools in specified districts working together to integrate his research, promoting school wide ‘fairs’ for students on neurodiversity, and hiring a neurodiversity coordinator to help monitor the changes put into place. Where is the funding for these extra services going to be found? Will it take away services that are already in place for students? Will funding for a coordination for a school district make funding dry up for special education teachers in different schools in the district? It is really hard to know and the author has not addressed that at all.

As stated above, I would really like to understand how this research can be funded and put into common usage. As a mother of a child with a few learning disorders, I see a potential benefit for using Armstrong’s research for changing the way that school deal with and teach individuals with disabilities. As neurotypical students also have many different ways of learning, it seems correct to believe that all students may need some help for success in the classroom. As such, it seems reasonable that educators who recognize the differences between a “disability paradigm” and a “diversity paradigm” would be able to quickly modify the ways that they provide services to their students. I would like to have a better understanding of how best to help ‘change perspectives’, both in educators and parents to see a more positive yet realistic outcome for their children. I would also like to know exactly how accessible the student strengths assessments are to educators and whether there are fees or other hurdles to ease of use. As the most clear cut assessment mentioned- the Neurodiversity Strengths checklist- was developed by the author, I would want to understand what financial benefits he might enjoy from this product. (This could also be seen as another weakness in the article as it might be more of a sales pitch depending on what benefits the author stands to gain.) Also, Armstrong mentioned some ways of modifying lessons to help students with learning differences achieve better results from their students. However, every modification he mentioned suggests to me that the students he is thinking of would have two specific traits; at least normal intelligence as defined by current special education assessments and their education would be provided by a decently funded educational system. I would be curious to see what modifications that he would recommended for individuals of less than normal intelligence scores (forms of mental retardation) or for individuals who attend schools with significant funding issues that can’t afford to purchase specialized software, virtual reality applications, etc. I could not tell if Armstrong had studied the ramifications of working with students who display significant physical, mental, or learning challenges when developing his views and conducting his research as this information was not mentioned. I would really like to know how his theories work and can be used across the whole spectrum of students and not just a majority.

I can see several ways that Armstrong’s research can be used in practical settings in schools. For schools districts and educators that are able to see their students from the perspective of student strengths over weakness, teaching and inclusion could become more specific for each student- even in larger classes. Currently, inclusion of special education students in mainstream classrooms can make teachers feel overwhelmed and they can view these students as a distraction or encumbrance to themselves and the others students. Any perspective that helps teachers to see the good in the children they teach and give them a desire to help all students perform at their best regardless of ability is an essential part of true classroom inclusion. As Armstrong mentioned in this article, when teachers view particular students negatively, other students may develop the same attitude towards those students. This can lead to bullying, ostracizing, and other negative consequences towards special education students which can create an unsafe school situation for all participants.

One way that this research can be applied is to provide a more specific emphasis in equality in the school environment. By helping students to learn with the strengths that they have, it should create an environment that doesn’t stratify as easily among financial and perceived intellectual lines. I suspect there will always be some form of social class functionality in a school- there will always be a student who is always last to be picked for team sports for example- but helping to minimize those aspects in classrooms by creating more equal opportunities for learning should be very helpful for helping students to prepare for their future. Teachers who are able to take the time to understand both the weaknesses and strengths of the children that they teach can take that knowledge into the mainstream classroom to create an inclusive learning environment that holds realistic and high standards for all student participants. These actions as performed by teachers conform to the recommended guidelines in the InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards; specifically, Standard #2 titled Learning Differences.

I also think that teachers that encourage students to utilize learning by tapping into their strengths are teachers that affected students will work harder to achieve for. At the beginning of this class, almost all learners mentioned a specific teacher that made a difference in their lives and all of those teachers had one thing in common. That commonality was that each student felt the teacher’s sincere desire and support for the student’s educational growth . When each of us feel cared for and developed a strong bond with that teacher, we worked harder and achieved more because our success was no longer just for us, but also to cement the relationship that had been previously created between teacher and pupil. Not all teachers feel inspired or have any desire to develop that kind of deep relationship with their students, but all anecdotal evidence provided in class suggests that teachers who create positive circles of communications and a unique relationship with each student do create significant knowledge growth and more positive outlooks for these students. I suspect that teachers who are willing and desire to create these tight bonds with students will also desire to provide the student what they need to succeed. If so, that extra time or service will not feel so strongly like a burden to be endured, but a challenge to overcome; a slight difference in viewpoint, but one ripe with better outcomes.

I found myself very interested in Amstrong’s research and I am happy that my library search brought it to light. I thought the article well written and provided many opportunities for thought and opportunities for more research. I can think of several ways that this information could be utilized in a classroom and I hope that these particular recommendations are incorporated into the traditional special education programs that are currently functioning in schools locally and across the country. I would be interested in seeing how these techniques work in the typical classroom and within the resources currently available to rural schools. I look forward to more research to suggest whether this program is optimal for most students.

Any thoughts on both the articles and it's topic? An experience that you wish to share? I'm eager to hear if anyone has first hand experiences with this program and it's implementation....

Self Care.... Filled with Hormones

I have been struggling this semester. I think there are a few reasons including feeling a lot less motivation with the loss of my grandpa, work health problems... the usual suspects. I tried to work on some homework but I seem to be unable to concentrate on either history nor interdisciplinary studies so I found myself roaming my shelves for something to read. I have agreed to try and take some time for self care- I'm quite terrible at it and I am working to do a little better- and I have decided that some of my self care should include stretching and fun reading. My eyes slid down the rows of books and then stopped on my nutrition textbook. I have never been willing to get rid of it because I sometimes find myself using it as a resource for trying to understand comments from my doctor better or even as a resource for a history paper. So, amusingly enough I hauled it to the couch (We can't say I picked it up because it's huge) for a bit of 'light, restful reading. I found myself quite frustrated by the reading so please take that in mind when I discuss my thoughts below... I guess it wasn't very restful reading.

I entered this chapter with little knowledge about hormones and how they affect the average person’s body, and by extension, my own. I have listened to doctors chatting about my hormones to my parents from about the age of 14 onward. In almost every doctor’s appointment that I attend as well as incidental evidence in my own life, my hormones are in control of me… and not me of them. I see menstruation and the whole process of hormones in a very negative light. As early as 18 years old I wanted to get a hysterectomy to try and end at least part of the process. The only thing that has stopped me from a hysterectomy is money... and if I was offered the opportunity to have it done tomorrow and have it paid for...I would not hesitate at all. As mentioned in the text, some of the societal and cultural ideas around menstruation are definitely alive in my mind for I too believe that I am filthier and more disgusting during the time of my menstruation and I want to avoid people and try to do anything I can to hide it. I don't talk about it much and I used to go to great lengths to hide any evidence including sanitary supplies from any one in my home- I even used to hide it from my husband when I was married... which was challenging and sure looks foolish from where I stand now. The way I think sure has changed... as evidenced that I am try to talk about it here. I found myself a bit bemused to read the words on the pages in front of me such as “One Indian phrase for menstruation is the flower growing in the house of the god of love” and “when researchers looked for positive changes in the premenstrual phase, they can find those as well." I haven't found those yet I guess.

The chapter listed a lot of research on women's health as well as hormones and sexuality. I suspect that the reason there appears to be so much research focused towards these topics is that hormonal changes are seen as an overall negative in quality of life for the majority of women. As Americans live in a fairly patriarchal society and women are not seen or treated in many cases as equal to men, focusing on the differences- and perceived negative differences- makes perfect sense. In general, if we look for the bad over the good that is what we will find. As a history buff, the discussion of women, women’s health, and sexuality have been seen in a negative light throughout many cultures and ages in time. The text also mentions that religion can also play a role in how hormonal changes, menstruation and reproductive activities are viewed and treated. It seems clear to me that many cultures and religions view the unique actions of women's bodies as problematic and use social pressure to control these actions, using members of both genders to create and reinforce this pressure. Another thing that most people who practice medicine have noticed that wasn’t mentioned in the text is that there is gender bias when it comes to many serious problems such as pain, heart attack, etc. How a person is treated when experiencing these disorders can vary widely based on the gender of the person experiencing them and that bias tends to create more negative outcomes for women than for men. What these facts and ideas say about our culture are not great. If the perspectives and biases in our culture and society tend to be more negative towards women, their health and potential in our society, it shouldn’t come as a shock that more studies are focused on the negative aspects of women and their health when research is being discussed, funded, and developed. If society sees men unconsciously as physically better and less hormonal as the male gender has no outward appearance of hormonal changes as stated in the text, then it also makes sense that research is much less likely to turn its focus toward men. Research in general tends to start with the spark of an idea on how something works, an idea of how to change something, or even how to fix a problem or perceived difficulty. If a culture in general is unable to recognize that men’s hormonal cycles exist or that they are important, no funding or time is going to be focused on that as it will be seen as waste of time and resources. I think that creates difficulty for both genders as men’s health and experience is ignored or undervalued so that problems are not recognized and potentially helped and women find that that their health and the study of their health is focused more on the negative aspects of it – or perceived negative aspects- and less on the positive traits and aspects of the health differences.

If more research was focused towards men and their health as well as hormonal cycles, I believe that we could gain knowledge that could be quite beneficial for men and the health problems that occur for them. However, it must be acknowledged that the majority of all medical research is focused on men- just not hormonal research- and it is vital to start including women in these processes. Excuses for leaving women out of health studies include the perceived 'variability' of their hormone cycle and the 'uniqueness' of the female body's functions... which feels a bit like a cope out. After all, the majority of all of our bodies- male and female- work and respond the same in similar circumstances.

I am not sure that reading this was really good self care or if I found myself distracted and worked up about something that really isn't super relevant to my life right now. But I found a few things that I was interested in researching at some point. I wonder how much of my health problems is based on some of the external influences the text mentioned. Do I feel more pain because of hormonal changes or because I feel like I ‘should’? Do I feel dirty and awful because of my sensory disorders which cause challenges with the physical sensations… or do I feel that way because I have been taught/ influenced to feel that way? Are the mental symptoms of confusion and personality ‘changes’ really a part of the hormonal changes, part of what I expect to happen, or pieces of both intertwined in the perspective and package of me? Certainly interesting questions to ponder this evening. Although the ponder must end soon as the guys are headed over. :D

What are your thoughts?

Research Methodologies

One of the most challenging tasks that educated adults need to undertake is to look critically at the world and media around us. Much of television and the Internet are full of vast numbers of stories on scientific research telling their audience how each of us should eat or drink, rear our children, what to purchase, what medication you must use, and other ‘needed’ information. Many of the studies cited in these shows or ads are groups of data that have been manipulated to suggest the outcome shown so it is not unusual to find ‘studies’ that directly contradict each other or doctors that play fast and loose with manipulated data to push specific product consumption. This only emphasizes the importance of a critical mindset with an understanding of research methods so that an informed decision about any question can be obtained. This short paper will look at three journal articles published in scientific journals and how different way of collecting and aggregating data were used to produce the outcomes described. This paper will focus only on the research methods used, not on the topics researched, however, I chose these three articles in particular because the subjects of race, gender, and the teaching profession were common to all three. (I am sorry that I could only link to one site with the full article- I originally printed out the articles from a library site that I no longer have access to. I can help point you in the right direction if my listings are unable to help- just let me know in the comments.)

My first article choice was published by the European Journal of Teacher Education and is titled “Race and Sex: Teacher’s Views on Who Gets Ahead in Schools”. Research for this article was completed by using a few similar methods to create three different data sources; a large scale postal survey of approximately 13,000 teachers from randomly selected schools, in-depth case studies of 18 schools chosen for the study based on specified guidelines, and several workshop discussions outside school settings that were conducted with specific interested parties. Using both qualitative and quantitative methods, the research results were able to be used to aggregate data to look for common or consistent themes in the data collected. It used questionnaires to gather answers to specific inquiry, surveys available to desired communities of interest, and unstructured interviews to gain more information on the answers and additional information on periphery connections. These authors used fairly traditional methods in their research, sticking with specific methods of collection that are scientifically recognized and more likely to pull together an accurate conclusion.

The second article chosen was published in 2000 in the journal Gender and Education and is titled “The Other Side of the Gender Gap”. Research for this article was pulled together using first, an intensive study of one selected school, and then branched out to encompass 15 schools that then used surveys/questionnaires completed by year 11 students of both genders. As an addition to this research, both a comparison of pupil and teacher expectations was completed along with analysis of GCSE results, staff interviews, and classroom observations. Using mostly quantitative methods allowed the researchers to gain information that allowed them to make fairly precise comparisons of data throughout the researched group. However, as this study only used one method of data collection, it has the problem of being fairly limited in how the data collected can be used and extrapolated. Also, for very complex subjects, this research method alone usually is not strong enough to accurately explain those issues.

The last article chosen was published in 2007 in the Cambridge Journal of Education and is titled “‘The Bar is Slightly Higher’: the Perception of Racism in Teacher Education”. As this article discusses research conducted as part of a larger study, there are a fewer research methods discussed. The methods used for this portion of the study were mostly interviews; either face to face, by telephone, or in focus group discussions that explored issues that had arisen from the questionnaire survey or issues that were not able to be addresses in the original questionnaire. For the purposes of data collection for this portion of the project, the research method used was unstructured interviews of 29 selected study participants. Some of the strengths of performing unstructured interviews include; participants can answer open ended questions in depth giving researchers a solid foundation of how the interviewee feels about the subject presented, interviewer can ask more questions or ask for clarifications to avoid misunderstandings, and these types of interviews are most flexible, giving researchers a way to change questions or focus if needed due to the answers provided by participants. However, this form of research method in terms of cost, time consumption, and not using enough participants can result in data that is hard to accurately use or provide meaningful results.

A scholar who is studying topics umbrellaed into the subject of education and sociology (or any subject really) needs to recognize the research methods that are used to collect information as well as the strengths and limitations of each one. Only one journal article that I analyzed above used a few methods that consisted of both qualitative and quantitative criteria making that particular study probably the most accurate and actionable of the three. One aspect of study research that I discovered is that searching for subjects by topic or focus will help narrow your search for relevant articles, but may inadvertently feed the researcher many sources using incomplete or inappropriate methods. It can also cause you to leave a prepared list to find ‘something new’ and as your study commences, the researcher may realize they haven’t left the prepared listing at all- I did. It is fairly valuable then to recognize research methods and be able to quickly determine through a brief reading of the abstract what research might be more pertinent to your study as well as how accurate the methods are in use. This felt like a valuable foray into the beginnings of understanding different research methods and their use.

what are your thoughts on how research is performed? What research methods seem the most accurate to you?

To Copy an Artist- My Take on Kenneth Callahan's "Crow"

A few years ago now- I can't believe its been so long- I went up to Washington to visit with a friend. One of the things I really wanted to do was explore a museum- I haven't gone to one in ages and I also needed to pick a piece of artwork to try and imitate or copy. I looked at so many pieces that I loved and took lots of pictures, but I finally settled on a specific piece by Kenneth Callahan. The piece was a simple picture of a crow, but I will admit it captivated me. The first image is my reproduction of his work - not bad, but clearly not as good.

Here is a photo of the original artwork created by Kenneth Callahan hanging up in the Tacoma Art Museum

Self Reflection Collage

Here is two views of my finished product:

So here is a copy of my final art project. My silhouette is completed with more emphasis the disparate parts within the body- even though I think that most of the separation is really in my mind and attitude. My body has very little color because while I am not goth, I tend to where only dark colors no matter how often good friends have tried to get me to do otherwise. My hair is stringy and full of curls and craziness because that is the way my hair tends to be which is why it is always tied back and away from my face and skin- because my hair is so crazy I pretty much used gesture to create it while it is pretty obvious in other areas I was more careful with my line drawing. However, I feel more beautiful when it is down, hence, why I tried to leave it down in this work. My hands are folded to not only hold people and things back from me but to hold a book which is my favorite thing to do..... after cats. I am an animal fanatic and I have eight cats, five ferrets, and a hamster- all rescues with the exception of Desdemona the hamster. My son, cats, and reading are the highlights of my world... with an occasional eggnog for a treat. :)

Color 2.0

More fun with color...

Light and Dark in Art

As part of my art class, I needed to define a few terms and create an image of the different positions of light and dark with the shading that occurs based on where the light is positioned. Here are some brief definitions or explainations along with the light and shade project.

The difference between the terms tint and shade is how they are used to change color. To change a color’s tint, an artist adds some white to the basic hue. To change a color’s shade, an artist adds black to the basic hue. The tint and shade change depending on how much white or black is added creating a huge variance in colors and their appearance.

The term chiaroscuro is used to describe the effects of light and dark when used to create images. It refers to how the artist balances both light and dark in their creation and how they use this idea to skillfully create the views and ideas that they want the audience to see and comprehend in their work. Using chiaroscuro helps an artist create mood, emotions… even reality and dimension. It can provoke desire and need or even grief, revulsion, or fear. It can be used to emphasize certain aspects in the artwork and hide other areas. Used by a skillful artist, it can create a breathtaking, compelling work of art that draws the audience into the emotions and reality it creates.

Modeling is the term used to describe the use of chiaroscuro to represent light falling against a curved surface. It is a term that describes the different ways light moves across a round object and how the light hits the object and changes the shadows and the way light makes the object look. The basic ways of modeling includes highlighting, the shadow and core shadow, reflected light and the cast shadow.

Tenebrism is a technique of lighting that makes use of large areas of dark and murky picture contrasted with smaller highly illuminated areas in the work. It is different from chiaroscuro in that the light in tenebrism is used to emphasize objects and create emotion in the work while the use of light in chiaroscuro is used to make the object emphasized more lifelike and natural. Each technique creates the reality and emotion of the art in different ways and help the audience create a different perspective to the work.

Hatching is a technique that uses closely spaced parallel lines in an area to create depth and shadow in an image. The hatching creates dimension in a flat image bring a sense of dimension and reality to the image. Cross hatching is a technique where one set of hatches is crossed at an angle to create darker and ‘deeper’ images and shadow.

Color 1.0

My first color wheel...